Evaluation Design
The design phase is where groups make specific decisions about what information will be collected, how, and when. In an ideal situation, these decisions would be driven by the questions the group has chosen to ask, and the level of specificity, surety and timeliness needed to answer the questions. In the real world, evaluation design usually considers those issues, but final decisions are often made based on available capacities and resources for evaluation, the kinds of information that key audiences believe matters, the difficulty or ease of getting data from various people, groups and systems, and other real world issues. This is a key step to watch for privilege influencing the work. Privilege infects evaluation when these real world issues override the integrity of evaluation – often not with that intent, but with that impact. This happens when, for example, communities or programs are judged as “failures” based on looking for results too soon, but reporting them anyway, or failing to control for inequitable distribution of opportunities and system resources in looking at why certain groups score less well on health, education and income measures.
Subcategory Title
Title | Author | Organization |
---|---|---|
Subcategory Title
Title | Author | Organization |
---|---|---|
Subcategory Title
Title | Author | Organization |
---|---|---|
“If a community has to be evaluated by a foundation, then the foundation has to be evaluated by the community. This is scary for foundations, and difficult for communities.”
~ Barbara Major, Racial Justice Activist,
Flipping the Script: White Privilege and Community Building
SPOTLIGHT
Leading for Equity – Gita Gulati-Partee, TEDxUNCSalon
Also in this section:
-
Category Title
GLOSSARY
Cultural Appropriation
Theft of cultural elements—including symbols, art, language, customs, etc.—for one’s own use, commodification, or profit, often without understanding, acknowledgement,or respect for its value in the original culture. Results from the assumption of a dominant (i.e. white) culture’s right to take other cultural elements.
SOURCE: Colours of Resistance Archive, “Cultural Appropriation” (accessed June 2013).
Cultural Racism
Cultural racism refers to representations, messages and stories conveying the idea that behaviors and values associated with white people or “whiteness” are automatically “better” or more “normal” than those associated with other racially defined groups. Cultural racism shows up in advertising, movies, history books, definitions of patriotism, and in policies and laws. Cultural racism is also a powerful force in maintaining systems of internalized supremacy and internalized racism. It does that by influencing collective beliefs about what constitutes appropriate behavior, what is seen as beautiful, and the value placed on various forms of expression. All of these cultural norms and values in the U.S. have explicitly or implicitly racialized ideals and assumptions (for example, what “nude” means as a color, which facial features and body types are considered beautiful, which child-rearing practices are considered appropriate.)
SOURCE: RacialEquityTools.org, MP Associates, Center for Assessment and Policy Development, and World Trust Educational Services.
Related Resources: Racism (navigate alphabetically to the box for “Cultural Racism”)
Location: FUNDAMENTALS / Core Concepts
Ethnicity
A social construct that divides people into smaller social groups based on characteristics such as shared sense of group membership, values, behavioral patterns, language, political and economic interests, history, and ancestral geographical base.
Examples of different ethnic groups are: Cape Verdean, Haitian, African American (Black); Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese (Asian); Cherokee, Mohawk, Navaho (Native American); Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican (Latino); Polish, Irish, and Swedish (White).
SOURCE: Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice: A Sourcebook, edited by Maurianne Adams, Lee Anne Bell, and Pat Griffin, Routledge, 1997.
Related Resources: Race, Ethnicity, and Indigeneity (navigate alphabetically to the box for “Ethnicity”)
Location: FUNDAMENTALS / Core Concepts
Inclusion
Authentically bringing traditionally excluded individuals and/or groups into processes, activities, and decision/policy making in a way that shares power.
SOURCE: OpenSource Leadership Strategies
People of Color
Often the preferred collective term for referring to non-White racial groups. Racial justice advocates have been using the term “people of color” (not to be confused with the pejorative “colored people”) since the late 1970s as an inclusive and unifying frame across different racial groups that are not White, to address racial inequities. While “people of color” can be a politically useful term, and describes people with their own attributes (as opposed to what they are not, e.g., “non-White”), it is also important whenever possible to identify people through their own racial/ethnic group, as each has its own distinct experience and meaning and may be more appropriate.
SOURCE: Race Forward, “Race Reporting Guide” (2015).
Racial and Ethnic Identity
An individual’s awareness and experience of being a member of a racial and ethnic group; the racial and ethnic categories that an individual chooses to describe him or herself based on such factors as biological heritage, physical appearance, cultural affiliation, early socialization, and personal experience.
SOURCE: Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice: A Sourcebook, edited by Maurianne Adams, Lee Anne Bell, and Pat Griffin, Routledge, 1997.
Related Resources: Race, Ethnicity, and Indigeneity (includes “Resources by Specific Racial/Ethnic Groups”)
Location: FUNDAMENTALS / Core Concepts
Structural Racialization
Structural racialization connotes the dynamic process that creates cumulative and durable inequalities based on race. Interactions between individuals are shaped by and reflect underlying and often hidden structures that shape biases and create disparate outcomes even in the absence of racist actors or racist intentions. The presence of structural racialization is evidenced by consistent differences in outcomes in education attainment, family wealth, and even life span.
SOURCE: Systems Thinking and Race: Workshop Summary by john a. powell, Connie Cagampang Heller, and Fayza Bundalli (The California Endowment, 2011).
Related Resources: Structural Racism
Location: FUNDAMENTALS / Core Concepts
Whiteness
The term white, referring to people, was created by Virginia slave owners and colonial rules in the 17th century. It replaced terms like Christian and Englishman to distinguish European colonists from Africans and indigenous peoples. European colonial powers established whiteness as a legal concept after Bacon’s Rebellion in 1676, during which indentured servants of European and African descent had united against the colonial elite. The legal distinction of white separated the servant class on the basis of skin color and continental origin. The creation of ‘whiteness’ meant giving privileges to some, while denying them to others with the justification of biological and social inferiority.
Whiteness itself refers to the specific dimensions of racism that serve to elevate white people over people of color. This definition counters the dominant representation of racism in mainstream education as isolated in discrete behaviors that some individuals may or may not demonstrate, and goes beyond naming specific privileges (McIntosh, 1988). Whites are theorized as actively shaped, affected, defined, and elevated through their racialization and the individual and collective consciousness formed within it ... Whiteness is thus conceptualized as a constellation of processes and practices rather than as a discrete entity (i.e. skin color alone). Whiteness is dynamic, relational, and operating at all times and on myriad levels. These processes and practices include basic rights, values, beliefs, perspectives, and experiences purported to be commonly shared by all but which are actually only consistently afforded to white people.
SOURCE:
1. PBS, “Race: The Power of an Illusion” (2018–2019 relaunch of 2003 series).
2. Robin DiAngelo, “White Fragility” (International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 2011).
Related Resources: System of White Supremacy and White Privilege
Location: FUNDAMENTALS / Core Concepts